Document Actions

Leeming Rec Centre’s Future Sealed

Published Date: 22 October 2009, 12:00 AM

The City of Melville’s ongoing efforts to ensure the community maintains access to Leeming Recreation Centre have resulted in a positive outcome for all stakeholders. Minister for Lands Brendon Grylls has now approved the lease agreement between the City and Leeming Recreation Indoor Sports, following Melville Council’s endorsement in September. The lessee plans to take over the facility from 1 December 2009.

Mayor Russell Aubrey described this resolution as a win for the whole City, as it meant substantial cost savings over the next 10 years while the community retained access to this facility and to extended services.

“This landmark outcome comes as a result of strong governance and sound decision-making by Council – and a commitment to refocusing the management and delivery of service at the centre. It demonstrates what we are trying to achieve across the City in terms of infrastructure rationalisation and reducing the rates burden as much as possible. This resolution follows substantial efforts by the City to ensure a balance between providing services that are suitable and cost-effective, and involving and engaging our key stakeholders. All interest groups have now agreed to this being a successful resolution,” he said.

Chief Executive Officer Dr Shayne Silcox said the City estimated an approximate $800,000 annual saving, compared with 2007/2008 actual costs to operate the facility. “This saving will be redistributed into other products and services in the community as appropriate,” he said.

"The City has been focused on achieving a community outcome where recreational activities are still supplied, but by a private party, which reduces the financial burden on the City of Melville ratepayers. It is disappointing that finalisation of this matter has been delayed by political interference," he said.

“However, I appreciate the support of all concerned and congratulate the Ward Councillors and Mayor for their resolve during this tedious and involved process. The City staff involved have also shown first-class professionalism in dealing with the matter. We now look forward to operating the lease and trust it delivers the benefits we all hope for,” he said.

Mayor Aubrey said proposed recreational activities included the introduction of: indoor cricket competitions; professional cricket coaching; holiday camps; specialist programs; children’s use of the gymnasium; and a sports store. “This is in addition to the continued offering of: indoor netball and soccer; a gymnasium; circuit and group training. Squash courts will also be refurbished with the possibility of reinstating courts previously converted to program spaces,” he said.

“The pool has now been decommissioned, however, it is anticipated that this area will get greater public utilisation and therefore provide greater community benefit under the new lease. Leeming Senior High School will also retain the same level of access to the centre,” he said. “Under the new lessee, the centre will also accommodate opportunities for viable, alternative recreational programs supported by the community.”

Dr Silcox said as part of the lease agreement, Leeming Recreation Indoor Sports had the City’s endorsement to go through the process of applying for a liquor licence – as was an accepted practice with indoor sports centres. “However, if approved, this licence would be unlikely to operate during school hours. Additionally, if it were agreed to by the licensing body, the licence could be revoked at any time if conditions of the licence are not adhered to, or there are too many complaints. The City has also appointed an architect and is putting together tender specifications for necessary repair work to the centre’s roof. The cost and timing of this is subject to the tender process, however, the City has made a budget allowance for the work, and it will be done in consultation with the new operators,” he said.

Removing equipment from LRC

Posted by Kiri at 26 October 2009, 08:40 AM
If the city is quite supportive of the Lease Agreement & is concerned about welfare of the people then why is the council removing group fitness equipments during the transitional period? Equipments are being removed thus providing poor service to current customers & the council is heavily advertising to sway all the customers from LRC to the Melville aquatic center.

During this transitional period the lease operator has not been given an opportunity to present his case to the customers by supplying his equipments & promote his management. It would be ethical for the council to remove the necessary equipments once the lease operator has had his opportunity to supply the necessary equipments & present his case.

Council definitely does not look quite supportive of the transition of the LRC but rather insisting on inconveniencing the existing customers


RE: Removing equipment from LRC

Posted by Peter de Lang at 28 October 2009, 09:24 AM
Hi Kiri, thank you for your feedback.

The planning for the construction of a group cycling studio at Melville Aquatic fitness Centre (MAFC) had been underway well before lease negotiations were initiated and the program was on the agenda to always move to MAFC, regardless of whether a lease agreement was finalised or not. It was initially discussed that LRIS weren't going to run group cycling classes, however, once the lease agreement had been signed, LRIS indicated to Lifestyle Services that their intention was to continue to run all current programs at LRC.

The City of Melville is commited to ensuring LRIS have every chance of success and therefore Lifestyle Services will be continuing to run programs as they are until the building has been handed over to LRIS, confirmed to be 1 December 2009. The group cycling program will continue at LRC and there is an adequate amount of equipment for participants and the sound system being used is a quality system that is used for aqua aerobics.

I trust that the above information sheds some light on the concerns you have raised.
Thanks again for your feedback, it's most appreciated.

Kind Regards,

Peter de Lang
Programs Manager

Decommissioned Pool

Posted by Craig at 30 October 2009, 12:53 PM
In 2008 we were told that the aquatic centre was closing temporarily for much needed repairs.
Now we are told that it is gone, and to have our kids learn to swim we can travel to Melville Aquatic Centre.
Well...ah....thanks. The proximity of the LRC and the community pool was a big factor in purchasing our home.
A walk or a bike ride to the LRC for a swim or some swimming lessons used to be a fantastic family fun event.
I think now that perhaps we should have bought in Melville. I feel like the Aquatic centre has been hijacked from the Leeming Community. Was this due to poor investment in USA prior to the GEC? Because prior to this, it seemed that repairs were all that was required and the pool would be re-opened. Also, the Aquatic Centre seemed to be perfectly functional and in no disrepair at all. What exactly was wrong with it?

Leeming Pool

Posted by Fayley Arthur at 02 November 2009, 08:03 AM
Decomissioned pool ... what the ..? Now where to? Melville pool has terrible acoustics and is very noisy and awful. I love how the decomissioning of the pool was mentioned "by the way" at the end of the "we're so great" article! If there is a good reason and sound arguements, then I might feel better about it - can someone explain honestly and with no jargon why the Leeming pool has gone?

Angry no more Pool in Leeming

Posted by Michelle Davies at 19 November 2009, 03:23 PM
I too am annoyed about the pool suddenly disappearing. I have used it for many years and much prefer it to travelling all the way to either Melville or Riverton. It was something that the Leeming people and nearby suburbs treasured. We were all told it was a temporary arrangement when our children's swimming lessons were transferred and there's been little or no mention of the pool since it closed. All of a sudden there's this announcement which barely mentions the pool. With a bit of tidying up, the Leeming community could have continued to use and treasure this pool - if the rec centre is staying open, then why on earth would they get rid of the pool. Leeming is closer to Riverton, so I guess I will have to travel there. Not happy Melville council!

No notice of closure

Posted by Graeme at 02 March 2010, 09:16 AM
It would have been nice to have some notice that the centre was changing hands. I played squash last week and booked again for this week. I was not informed that the facilities were changing hands and that my Melville Premier membership would no longer be valid at Leeming.

Failure

Posted by Anthony at 02 March 2010, 09:16 AM
A recreation center without a pool ?
I havent heard of one or hear of one that goes well. I truly cant understand how they have the thought of no swimming activity,
in a recreation center. Its mind blowing !
I myself have a pool and do not considerably need this for me personal use, but however taking it away for the future
family's with young kids, the closest place to learn to swim would have been the LRC, However this is no longer the case :(
It seriously made the LRC a big good place, i truly hate the idea no pool, after playing some heavy sports, if its
basketball, squash or in the gym you could think that you would be able to have a nice dip in the pool.

Nope sorry no more i would not like to come to a center with no pool...
In few words this is a failed decision, where it COULD have been turned into something fantastic.

Tragic loss of decent swimming pools in Perth

Posted by Karen at 31 May 2010, 08:26 AM
I am a swim teacher and competitive swimmer - previously managed an adults learn to swim school. I trained at Leeming Rec centre for many years travelling from Willetton and for that reason am sentimentally attached to the pool and very disappointed to see it go. More importantly, I was about to head there to teach an adult friend who lives in Canning Vale how to swim. It is important to have 25m of pool you can stand up in that is indoor and heated for winter adult swimming lessons. Cannington is outdoors, Riverton is overcrowded and too deep, Melville is too deep. Are there any pools left in the area that are suitable??!! This is an absolutely tragic loss, with this council not being the only one to consider pools to be an expense rather than a community asset and necessity. We live in stinking hot Perth where so many of our activities are on and in the water - beaches and river. People need to learn to swim and councils should be responsible for providing the places to learn.

LEEMING REC COMMUNITY SERVICE

Posted by jay Simms at 21 January 2011, 02:20 PM
I'm really dissapointed, in the level of Customer Service supplied at the Rec, I have been going there with my Kid's for Years, but recently i got told if i had a issue with the Serving Alcohol, or the way they ran things, i should not bother bringing my Kid's there,

This mind you was by the Manager Nicole, who was supplying Alcohol, with out showing a License, and drinking with other People at the Venue, i understand this is ok, but it should not be done during the day with Kid's around.

Very Dissapointed our Voice's in the community go unheard due to it being owned by a Private Company.